35mm, Film, 35mm, and scans, Uncategorized, Yashica T2

Losing wind

New World

I tried doing something different.  I tried to give the home developed b/w film a rest, and to concentrate on using up some Poundland C41 colour 35mm film in the Yashica T2.

I don’t like it.  I don’t like the results.  That, combined with the winter light, work pressure, and lack of travel, has killed my photography.  I don’t like the results.  I’m finding myself looking at and appreciating more b/w film than ever.  I lost something.  I’m not going to abandon the Yashica T2 yet, but I’m abandoning the C41.  More Shanghai, Tmax, and Rollei film is on the way.  I miss my medium format as well.  The Bronica SQ-A is a great system camera – I want to use it again.

I’m not happy with my recent foray into C41 35mm.  I need to sniff fixer again.  All that it has taught me is to appreciate the beauty of b/w film photography more.

Above photo taken on the Yashica T2 and Poundland film in Norwich.

Advertisements
Standard
and scans, Film, 35mm, and scans, photography, Uncategorized

Shoe Box Photography

22677476627_29fa4dda86_c

I’m investigating snapshot photography, what it really means, and it’s value as a school of photography.  I visited my mother today, and nothing to do with this blog or investigation, but suddenly, the magic shoe box of old family photographs was pushed onto my lap.

I always loved browsing through these old photographs.  It seems a shame, that we print far less in the Age of Digital, and that future generations will miss out on this magic.

These photographs were shot on a roll film (120) camera, with narrow frames, that allowed more photographs to be captured.  However, they were printed from the negatives direct onto Ilford paper with no enlargement.  Tiny little prints.  They would have been taken during the mid 1950s.

The top photo is of my parents themselves.  A snapshot or a portrait?  My father was dressed up to the nines.  Apparently at that age, he did like to doll up though, so it may not have been a special event.  Funny, because later in life, he’d as often as not be found in a pair of work overalls.

The composition and framing are cracking.  It may have been my mother’s sister Gladys taking the photograph – using a box camera top viewer.  Not the easiest viewer to use – but look at the composition.  The trees, field, road edge line up perfectly, with the couple right of centre.  Happy accident or did the photographer, with no training from Digital Photography magazine, just know what looked best?

The bottom photo is of my mother’s sister, Gladys, with her fiancé Kenny at Great Yarmouth.  The two couples were having fun taking photographs of each other.  What is the camera that Gladys is holding?  It looks like a simple box camera.  Photography was bringing them joy and happiness, that is what serious photographers today often miss out on.  Snapshot photography was fun, but also recorded moments – the Kodak Moment sometimes.

The more that I look into it, the more that I respect snapshot photography.

Standard
Film Dark Room, Film, 35mm, and scans, Rants and discussions, Zenza Bronica SQ-A

Medium Format Film Street Photography for Dummies

Bronica SQ-A camera. Zenzanon PS 150mm f/4 lens. Ilford HP5 Plus film. Home developed in R09. Scanned film Epson Perfection V500.

The above negative was a wee bit thin and underdeveloped – not the best, despite using my digital scanner and Open Source software (Gimp) to improve it.  But I like it, and in amateur photography, that is what is important.

Medium Format film photography in the street, eh?  Who’d ever thought of such a thing.  Well beside a million box camera enthusiasts last Century, there were also the TLR enthusiasts including for example, Vivian Maier.

Don’t worry, I’m certainly not comparing my meagre efforts with Maier.  However, a few things have fired this post.  First, I read a question on Yahoo Answers, from a DSLR user, asking how to use software manipulation in order to emulate Vivian Maier.  Second, I do like to promote the use of medium format film in the street.  Oh, thirdly, in the back of my mind, a debate on a photography forum, whether we film photographers should bother with 35mm anymore.

I enjoy the challenge of lumping my Bronica SQ-A around a town centre.  I feel privileged to use it.  Most of the time, I’m assessing the exposure value merely on my eyes, brain, and the Sunny F16 rule.  Sometimes I use a phone app light meter, an actual old light meter, or a secondary camera built in light meter – but most of the time I simply use my eyes and judgement.  The Bronica has very logical and clunky stops – both a well marked aperture ring on the lens, and a chunky shutter speed control, with 500, 250, 125, 60, 30, and ridiculously slow shutter speeds.  I recently read a post by a DSLR user, that he couldn’t survive with a maximum speed of 1/500 s.  For crying out loud, we ain’t trying to freeze a hummingbird in motion out here in the street!

I’m learning street tricks with the Bronica.  For example the Candid.  I know some feel Candid to be perverse.  However, if you already are perverse (as I am), then try this.  The WLF.  People SEE you staring at them through a range finder or through a SLR / DSLR prism.  However, if you are looking DOWN into a waist level finder (WLF), they do not always cotton on … so to speak.  A photographer isn’t looking at them.  Hint 2.  You can always be even more perverse and incognito, by looking down into the WLF while not facing the subject – hold the camera at a degree to your body.  Ok, that is just nasty sneakiness for the coward (yes I’ve done it).  Another important lesson – learned by using fully manual cameras without any range finder:  Keep the WLF folded down.  You need enough light.  Keep the aperture small (F8 – F32) in order to maximise your chance of a reasonable focus over a field, and point the lens.  Best of course with a wide angle or standard lens.  Needs a fast mind.

Or of course, you can simply ask or nod at the subject before taking – but you will never have that natural or even better, surprised look.  The above photo, I failed at a Candid – I was seen before I was ready- so I asked.  Nice, but not candid.

Getting back to that Vivian Maier look via digital.  Forget it.  Digital will not give either the tones, nor grain.  It’ll also miss the DoF.  Finally – it loses the perspective of her WLF.  Instead, buy a working condition old TLR film camera.  Buy some 120 film.  Then you are sorted.

As for giving up 35mm for 120?  Medium Format (or even better, Large Format) is the CREAM of film photography that Digital has not yet bettered.  However, there are so many freaking great 35mm film cameras out there on the market cheap as chips.  I’m not going 100% medium format yet.

 

Standard
Film, 35mm, and scans

Seeing red (in black & white) – and the 400S film enigma

Pentax SP500 Spotmatic. Super Takumar 55mm f/2 lens. Hoya 25A red filter. Firstcall (Agfa Gevaert) 400S b/w film. Developed in R09. Scanned film on Epson V500.

I’m starting to brave the infrared b/w film world, as another step on the learning curve.  These photographs barely qualify – shot with a simple 25A red filter, onto Agfa Gevaert 400S budget film.  However, I’ve now got my hands onto an R72 infrared filter, and I have some Agfa Infrared 400S loaded in the Spotmatic.  It’s sitting there waiting for the right light and subject.  I might try it out tomorrow if they are still harvesting pumpkins hear to my home.  I’ll see what light and sky is available.

Actually, I have a question – should any readers be in the know.  I’ve been buying (and loving) FirstCall 400S budget b/w 35mm film for the past year.  It’s actually made by Agfa Gevaert in Belgium, and sold by FirstCall for £2.49 per film (time of publish).  I ordered another 10 films recently, but my provider has been having trouble sourcing them.  They’ve today sent me ten rolls of Agfa Retro 400S.  Now, is there really any difference between the budget FirstCall 400S, the Agfa Retro 400S, the Rollei Retro 400S, and the more expensive Agfa Infrared 400S?  Are they all the same emulsion and film?  Does the Infrared have any special properties to the other 400S versions?

As above image – SP500, 25A red filter, FirstCall 400S.

As I said – these two images were branded FirstCall 400S.  I know that it has near IR sensitivity.  Both of these images shot in the Spotmatic with the plain jane 25A red filter.

Standard
Film, 35mm, and scans, Landscape and buildings, Monochrome

Expired Commerce

Expired Commerce. Pentax SP500 Spotmatic. Super Takumar 55mm f/2 lens. Firstcall (Agfa Gevaert) 400S b/w film. Developed in R09. Scanned film on Epson V500.

I like this one.  I think Nita noticed the antiquity of the shredded advertisement posters first.  We were walking down one of Wisbech’s old alleyways – this leading from the river, to the old market, when she spotted what we all pass everyday without seeing.  I had to step back into the back doorway of a nightclub, in order to frame it through the Super Takumar 55mm lens.  Just after I pressed down the shutter release on the Pentax Spotmatic, I was pushed in the back by a cleaner exiting the club.

Standard
Film, 35mm, and scans, Post process and software, Zenza Bronica SQ-A

Post Process Editing for a Hybrid Photographer

Focus! Photographer candid snapped in street Wisbech. Concentrate and zoom in. Bronica SQ-A camera. Zenzanon PS 150mm f/4 lens. Ilford FP4 Plus 120 film. Home developed in ID11.

I am a champion of Open Source software, especially of the excellent GIMP image editing package.  There is far too much snobbery against it from people that prefer to splash out massive bucks on bloatware (or steal it), rather than give this honest alternative a proper go. Listen – Gimp is free in more than one way, and it does everything that any amateur photographer should need.

I shoot mainly on film these days.  I develop the films myself, and dry them.  I then scan them on an Epson Perfection V500, which produces digital images from my negative films.  I do this because a) I love using old film cameras, and film itself, b) I enjoy the process of all of this work, it makes my images feel more valuable to myself, for putting in all of that effort.  c) Yeah, I like the ‘look’ of my crusty b/w hybrid film images.

So what do I use Gimp for, and for what?  Post digitalisation, my images still benefit from a digital retouch.  I use it to:

  1. Straighten wonky photos – deadly on a 6 x 6 photo.
  2. Crop.
  3. Heal and clone over dust and hair marks.
  4. Levels and curves, especially levels often could do with some improvements.
  5. Resize and compression for uploading to the web.  I tend to scan to a high resolution.
  6. Finally … Unsharp Mask.  Not always, and usually just a little.

And that is just about it.  My photography these days – as has been pointed out to me, uses rather minimal post process editing.  I try my best to make a photograph inside the camera.  As for my tastes in other people’s images.  I don’t like over post processing.  I really don’t like HDR.  Horses for courses, just not to my taste.

There you go Jeremy, my take on post process editing using Gimp – as a hybrid film photographer.  Thank you for asking, it finally prompted a long overdue post.

Standard
Film, 35mm, and scans, Monochrome, Portrait

The cheapest film photography?

Nita holding the Bronica in town. Taken with a Boots disposable film camera that expired in 2009. Developed cross process in B/W chemistry ID11 at 20C.

Go to any half sized car boot sale in the UK, there’s a fair chance that you might spot some unused but expired disposable film cameras laying in boxes or unlikely, displayed on tables.  These are part of that classic British household junk assemblage, that makes it’s way to the sales.  Some very basic, some with flash, and even a little electronics.  Bought maybe for a holiday or a trip, or a party, but never used.  Price? Always point out the expired date on the camera, and that any developing contract on it is out of it’s date.  Then haggle – aiming for 10p to 50p.  After all, it’s useless, isn’t it?  Don’t pay more than pennies on one.

What you have bought is in essence, rather similar to a hip Chinese Toy Camera, although at a tiny fraction of their bloated prices.  A plastic lens.  An expired film.  You may indeed choose to use it that way.  Perhaps have them developed in C-41 – or even cross processed to E6 at a local photolab.  You might be handy at C41 yourself, and have the chemistry at home.

Personally, I cross process them in B/W chemistry at home.  It makes for the cheapest ever photography – no more than 50p for the camera/film, and perhaps a similar cost in used chemicals.

The Back Yard. As above, taken by Nita. Expired disposable camera cross processed in B/W Ilford chemistry.

By the way, the top photo made it into the Flickr Explore gallery – a place that not every Canikon DSLR has ventured.  Cheap as chips.

Standard